JackronRM's Page

More from JackronRM

Forum Posts

Comments

Recommendations

Posted on: The Panama Creature! Alien? Gnome? Muppet?
at 09/18/2009 9:45pm

It strikes me as a hoax. Why not a picture of the whole body? Pictures seem to have been taken from several angles ... more(+)

It strikes me as a hoax. Why not a picture of the whole body? Pictures seem to have been taken from several angles but only of the upper half (uless it's the same picture reversed etc). A picture of 'it's' lower legs and body, including sexual organs, would add quite a lot more information as to what it could be. Also, it doesn't appear to have a cranium big enough to hold a hominid (or intelligent) brain. close(-)

Posted on: Human Evolution
at 07/18/2009 1:31am

Mick and Ed

Firstly. Since you are both 'fans' of Sec, I REALLY WOULD appreciate your explanation of what is so wrong ... more(+)

Mick and Ed

Firstly. Since you are both 'fans' of Sec, I REALLY WOULD appreciate your explanation of what is so wrong with my statement, in my previous posting, for it to cause yet ANOTHER of his outbursts of provocative, corrosive and childish sarcasm?

I agree with your opinion of Stichin's interpretation of ETs, Mick. It's a major 'bone of contention' between Lloyd Pye and myself. I just can't accept the concept of a 'Planet X' "fly by", etc, despite my SAET thoughts. Though I haven't 'closed my mind' to any part of Stichin's decyphering. He's quite a clever chap, whatever his critics say.

Ed. The "saucer" experiments by both the Krouts and you Yanks, were, imo, always doomed to failure for many reasons.

I endose your statement, 100%, about 'accepting' only that which is 'proven' and the observation of the 'exclusively human' characteristic of the ability to lie. It's one more characteristic that distances us so hugely from any other creature on the planet. close(-)

Posted on: Human Evolution
at 07/17/2009 8:29am

Mick

I understand where you're coming from. My skepticism rules out 90% of the "info?", but that remaining ... more(+)

Mick

I understand where you're coming from. My skepticism rules out 90% of the "info?", but that remaining 10% that just CAN'T be explained away, is far too interesting to be simply ditched without question.

Regarding the Sumerians, Zac Stichin (if that's who you are refering to), is just decyphering the Sumerians' writings. The advanced civilization that they (the Sumerians) were, is historical fact. close(-)

Posted on: Human Evolution
at 07/17/2009 2:23am

Mick

That "Mysteries" site you've come across is quite interesting and thought provoking, isn't it?

I do ... more(+)

Mick

That "Mysteries" site you've come across is quite interesting and thought provoking, isn't it?

I do offer some of those "mysteries" as possible support for my SAET suggestions, especially those that have no "Earthly" explanations (The ancient maps that could only have been drawn up by someone high ABOVE the Earth, for example). I also ask that consideration be given to the possibility that not all of the 'deformed' (unusual) skulls should be dismissed as naturally human (that are KNOWN to be as a result of 'head binding', 'head boarding' or 'brain swelling' etc), especially those that are symetrically perfect and identical to each other, and not being repeated in todays' world. Could THEY, possibly, also be 'part' or 'wholy' ET? (They don't, necessarily, have to have DNA too dissimilar from ours, since it could be possible and feasible for ALL 'beings' in the entire Universe to have the same, or very similar, DNA).

Given, also, the recorded evidence of the 'sudden' and inexplicable appearance of the 'super advanced' Summarians and their "god" (SAET?) leaders, for example, as just one of the advanced civilizations that have been discovered, does 'suggest', imo, more evidence of the possibility of SAET involvement, in our origin and existance on this planet. close(-)

Posted on: Human Evolution
at 07/12/2009 1:54pm

These soluble Asprins we used to take were definately not Alkaseltzers. We could only get them (SA's) from the Sick ... more(+)

These soluble Asprins we used to take were definately not Alkaseltzers. We could only get them (SA's) from the Sick Bay. It was only a 'gut feeling' (again, no pun intended) that they were responsible for the stones. Ed, have you tried Gaviscon(?) for your guts? Alkaseltzers are more for indigestion aren't they?

Re the hardness of the bone of the Starchild skull.. The first attempts to cut a sample from the SC skull (for tests) by normal methods (i.e. using normal caborundum cutters) failed miserably, they hardly scratched the surface (though samples were easily obtained from the other , human female skull, with the carborundum discs). Even with the diamond cutters, difficulties were experienced, and it is from those experiences that the scientists, who undertook the task, commented that, mysteriously, the SC bone was at least twice as hard as normal human bone. I'm not sure if there are any other pictures of the fibres protruding from the 'cut edge' of the bone, that are not already available (I'll make enquiries). But I do know that it wasn't untill the sample was cut from the real skull and closely examined, that the strange fibres and inexplicapble red residue (also INSIDE the bone) was discovered.

As soon as any new info unfolds, Ed, I will, of course, let you know. Like you say, whatever the outcome, it sure is a strange and different enough object from the 'normal' "abnormal" skull to inspire the intelligent and create VAST interest. close(-)

Commented on: POLL: Your View of Human Evolution
at 2009-11-22 00:05:15

Judahslyin

You say I'm a coward because I didn't respond to your hypocritical, insulting, sarcastic and stupidly ... more(+)

 close(-)

Commented on: POLL: Your View of Human Evolution
at 2009-11-21 04:06:21

mir6

You only need mick to join rueh and judahslion and all three of the gallant buckaneers have got you surrounded. ... more(+)

 close(-)

Commented on: POLL: Your View of Human Evolution
at 2009-11-19 06:44:23

Christ mick, you're up early!

I haven't a clue what you're on about, but keep cool. I'm done playing games with ... more(+)

 close(-)

Commented on: POLL: Your View of Human Evolution
at 2009-11-19 03:29:42

mir6

If you had read some of my earlier posts, which I understand why you might not have, given the task it would ... more(+)

 close(-)

Commented on: POLL: Your View of Human Evolution
at 2009-11-18 07:24:15

Where DO you get your wit and wisdom, Sticky Micky?

You deduced my sudden change of camps. By what, little man? ... more(+)

 close(-)

2009-10-30 | in Culture | by Charles Q. Choi

Top 10 Things that Make Humans Special
What separates humans from other animals? Some of the answers might surprise you.

2009-10-28 | in History | by Charles Q. Choi

Top 10 Mysteries of the First Humans
Humans are unique among life on this planet, and much remains a mystery as to how we evolved.

2009-06-29 | in Animals | by Clara Moskowitz

Are You More Like Chimps or Orangutans?
Contrary to popular wisdom, two biologists are arguing that orangutans, not chimps, are humans closest relatives.

2007-08-06 | in Strange News | by Ker Than

Greatest Mysteries: Does Alien Life Exist?
Increasingly, signs point to a "yes."

2008-07-28 | in Strange News | by Benjamin Radford">Benjamin Radford

Apollo Astronaut Believes in Aliens
Former Apollo astronaut Edgar Mitchell made news recently with claims about UFOs and alien cover-ups.